Sunday, December 12, 2010

The Picture of Dorian Gray

The Picture of Dorian Gray is a novel by Oscar Wilde, one of the most prominent members of the aesthetic movement. His novel relates to art, and its purpose. Wilde argues in the introduction to the novel that art’s purpose is to have no purpose- simply to exist, without having an overreaching moral lesson. He writes that “The only excuse for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely” (8).
The protagonist, Dorian Gray, is a young man who is said to be very beautiful and innocent. An older artist, Basil Hallward, cultivates a friendship with him that leads to his meeting Lord Henry, a gifted and influential speaker. The Lord advocates a radical policy of hedonism, or the pursuit of pleasure above all else, which is quite controversial in the morally strict time period. He enjoys shaping Dorian’s beliefs, and says that “’Because to influence a person is to give him one’s own soul. He does not think natural thoughts, or burn with his natural passions. His virtues are not real to him. His sins, if there are such things as sins, are borrowed’” (23). This becomes true for the impressionable Dorian when he is told that his beauty has more value than anything else in his life. Basil has painted a portrait of him, and the young man despairs that he shall age while it shall not. In thinking this, Dorian trades his own aging for that of the portrait’s, though he does not discover this for some time, when he begins to commit many sins in trying to live Lord Henry’s philosophies more fully. Sin is said to make a person ugly, and ages the portrait just as time does. One of the first examples of his sins is spurning the young actress, Sibyl Vane, whom he claimed to be in love with until she performed badly at a play. His rejection caused her to commit suicide, and though it shook Dorian, it was not enough to change his course. His lifestyle grew increasingly careless, causing his portrait self to decay with every misdeed. Dorian does not escape karma, however, when his choices ultimately lead him to a final desperate and destructive act. The portrait Basil painted was given a purpose, in being used for Dorian Gray’s selfish life, and consequently caused the man’s destruction.

1) Do you think that Dorian is responsible for his actions throughout the novel, or is Lord Henry instead responsible for teaching a moral code that he himself did not understand the implications of?
2) Wilde’s view on the purposelessness of art was highly controversial in the time. Many still believe that art is created to influence, or display views. Which philosophy do you personally agree with?

10 comments:

Avi D. 7/8 said...

1. I believe that Lord Henry was responsible for the actions because it was his code that forced Dorian to commit these actions. In fact it seems it was almost deliberate because in the summary you say that the Lord enjoyed shaping Dorian.

2. I personally believe that most art is pointless to me, however different people respond to different art. There are a few pieces of art that make me curious, but none cause emotional change to me. What seems pointless to me could seem moving to another. Art is therefore taken differently and it is how you perceive it.

Ashlyn W. 7-8 said...

I think Dorian is responsible for his own actions because everyone is in charge of what they do and not do. Lord Henry might have forced his teachings upon Dorian, but no one can make you do anything you do not want to do.

Ashlyn W. 7-8 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sydney M 7-8 said...

1. I think Dorian is responsible for his actions as well. Dorian could have decided for himself what to do and what he wanted to do. Yeah Lord Henry forced his code onto Dorian but he did not necassarily have to do what Lord Henry said.

Lisa T. 1-2 said...

I think that Lord Henry was responsible for Dorian's actions. Lord Henry provided Dorian with dangerous ideas and allowed them to grow out of control, for what seemed to be his own personal amusement. While Dorian was foolish and could have instead ignored the pressure and temptation, he was young and impressionable, and Lord Henry took advantage of that.

Millie W. 7/8 said...

1) I think Lord Henry is guilty of teaching the moral code, but Dorian is guilty of listening to everything he says.
2)As a artist I sort of agree with both. Some art like advertisements is meant to make you want to buy something, otherwise it wouldn't be a good advertisement. Other art is just meant to capture a moment in time and just make you wonder about the picture. What is going on in that picture, who is that man or woman? Are they going somewhere? I think art's very essence is to make a person wonder and further expand their minds.

Hannah K. 1-2 said...

Lisa, I agree with your opinion of Lord Henry. While Dorian is responsible for his own actions, he was a very naturally impressionable character, and Henry knowingly took advantage of him.

Hannah K. 1-2 said...

Millie, I completely agree with your answer to the second question, especially the last part. While I respect the author's views, I think that art definitely sometimes has a purpose.

Morgan O 7-8 said...

1) I think that both of them are responsible. Lord Henry did teach him this moral code, however Dorian was ultimately the one to go through with these actions.

Mrs. Sherwood said...

Thread graded